GPU comparison

A16 vs RTX 2000 Ada

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

AmperevsAda LovelaceUpdated 33 days ago

The RTX 2000 Ada wins for the most common use case of mixed precision inference because its 12 TFLOPS FP32 rating and 191.9 TFLOPS FP8 with sparsity exceed the corresponding published figures on the A16 while consuming only 70W TDP.

A16 listed from $0.06/GPU/hrRTX 2000 Ada listed from $0.24/GPU/hr

Right now, from live stock

  • Cheapest right now: RTX 2000 Ada at $0.24/hr on RunPod

    Deploy
  • Most providers in stock: RTX 2000 Ada (1)

    See all offers

Specifications Compared

SpecA16RTX 2000 Ada
TDP250W70W
VRAM16 GB16 GB
CUDA Cores1,2802,816
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
ArchitectureAmpereAda Lovelace
FP16 (dense)17.9 TFLOPSNot published
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
INT8 (dense)35.9 TOPSNot published
InterconnectPCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor Cores4088
FP32 Performance4.5 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
Memory Bandwidth200 GB/s224 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)Not published191.9 TFLOPS
FP16 (with sparsity)35.9 TFLOPSNot published
INT8 (with sparsity)71.8 TOPSNot published

Performance Analysis

The FP32 rating of 4.5 TFLOPS on the A16 versus 12 TFLOPS on the RTX 2000 Ada indicates that the latter delivers higher throughput for general floating point workloads. Memory bandwidth of 200 GB/s on the A16 compared with 224 GB/s on the RTX 2000 Ada permits modestly larger batch sizes during data movement intensive tasks. The A16 supplies FP16 dense at 17.9 TFLOPS and FP16 with sparsity at 35.9 TFLOPS whereas the RTX 2000 Ada provides no published FP16 figure so direct dense to dense or sparse to sparse comparison remains limited to the available FP32 numbers. TDP of 250W on the A16 versus 70W on the RTX 2000 Ada shows substantially higher power demand for the older GPU when executing identical operations.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

A16

A16 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the A16 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX 2000 Ada

ProviderRegionGPUsPer GPU / hrInstance / hrDeploy
RunPodglobal1$0.24—Deploy

1 provider in stock, 1 offer. All RTX 2000 Ada offers, price history and alerts

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when A16 drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the A16

The A16 suits workloads that require published INT8 dense performance of 35.9 TOPS or FP16 dense performance of 17.9 TFLOPS. Its 250W TDP rating supports sustained execution in environments where power limits remain secondary to these specific tensor metrics.

When to Choose the RTX 2000 Ada

The RTX 2000 Ada suits workloads that benefit from FP32 performance of 12 TFLOPS and FP8 with sparsity at 191.9 TFLOPS. Its 70W TDP rating enables operation in power constrained deployments where the 224 GB/s bandwidth supports efficient data handling.

Use Cases

LLM Training
RTX 2000 Ada

The RTX 2000 Ada supplies 12 TFLOPS FP32 which exceeds the 4.5 TFLOPS FP32 on the A16.

LLM Inference
RTX 2000 Ada

The RTX 2000 Ada provides FP8 with sparsity at 191.9 TFLOPS while the A16 lists no FP8 figure.

Fine-tuning
A16

The A16 supplies FP16 dense at 17.9 TFLOPS and INT8 dense at 35.9 TOPS for fine tuning steps.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 2000 Ada

The RTX 2000 Ada delivers higher FP32 at 12 TFLOPS and lower 70W TDP than the A16.

Scientific Computing
A16

The A16 lists INT8 dense at 35.9 TOPS and FP16 dense at 17.9 TFLOPS for scientific kernels.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FP32 performance difference between A16 and RTX 2000 Ada?▾

The A16 lists FP32 at 4.5 TFLOPS while the RTX 2000 Ada lists FP32 at 12 TFLOPS. This numeric gap determines suitability for floating point workloads.

How does memory bandwidth compare on the A16 versus RTX 2000 Ada?▾

The A16 provides 200 GB/s bandwidth and the RTX 2000 Ada provides 224 GB/s bandwidth. Both GPUs use 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM.

Which GPU has lower TDP between A16 and RTX 2000 Ada?▾

The RTX 2000 Ada has a TDP of 70W while the A16 has a TDP of 250W. Power constrained deployments therefore favor the RTX 2000 Ada.

Does the A16 publish FP16 performance figures?▾

The A16 publishes FP16 dense at 17.9 TFLOPS and FP16 with sparsity at 35.9 TFLOPS. The RTX 2000 Ada lists no FP16 figure.

Which is cheaper to rent, the A16 or the RTX 2000 Ada?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the A16 and RTX 2000 Ada vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the A16 have compared to the RTX 2000 Ada?▾

The A16 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 2000 Ada has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find A16 and RTX 2000 Ada GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the A16 and the RTX 2000 Ada?▾

The A16 uses the Ampere architecture (2021) while the RTX 2000 Ada uses Ada Lovelace (2024). The A16 has 16 GB of GDDR6 at 200 GB/s; the RTX 2000 Ada has 16 GB of GDDR6 at 224 GB/s, so the RTX 2000 Ada has 1.1x the memory bandwidth of the A16.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the A16 and the RTX 2000 Ada. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps