GPU comparison

A30 vs L40

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

AmperevsAda LovelaceUpdated 31 days ago

The L40 provides the stronger choice for the most common use cases because its 48 GB memory and 90.5 TFLOPS FP32 rating exceed the A30 equivalents while delivering competitive dense FP16 performance at 181.05 TFLOPS.

A30 listed from $0.35/GPU/hrL40 listed from $0.79/GPU/hr

Right now, from live stock

  • Cheapest right now: L40 at $0.79/hr on ThunderCompute

    Deploy
  • Most providers in stock: L40 (5)

    See all offers

Specifications Compared

SpecA30L40
TDP165W300W
VRAM24 GB48 GB
CUDA Cores3,58418,176
FP8 (dense)Not published362 TFLOPS
Memory TypeHBM2GDDR6
ArchitectureAmpereAda Lovelace
FP16 (dense)165 TFLOPS181.05 TFLOPS
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
INT8 (dense)330 TOPS362 TOPS
InterconnectNVLink, PCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor Cores224568
FP32 Performance10.3 TFLOPS90.5 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance5.2 TFLOPSNot published
Memory Bandwidth933 GB/s864 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)Not published724 TFLOPS
FP16 (with sparsity)330 TFLOPS362.1 TFLOPS
INT8 (with sparsity)661 TOPS724 TOPS

Performance Analysis

Dense FP16 performance stands at 165 TFLOPS on the A30 and 181.05 TFLOPS on the L40 while sparse FP16 reaches 330 TFLOPS on the A30 and 362.1 TFLOPS on the L40. The FP32 rating measures 10.3 TFLOPS on the A30 against 90.5 TFLOPS on the L40 so the L40 executes full precision workloads at a higher rate. Higher memory bandwidth of 933 GB/s on the A30 compared with 864 GB/s on the L40 can support larger batch sizes in memory bound scenarios despite lower dense FP16 throughput. INT8 dense performance equals 330 TOPS on the A30 and 362 TOPS on the L40 with corresponding sparse figures of 661 TOPS and 724 TOPS.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

A30

A30 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the A30 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

L40

ProviderRegionGPUsPer GPU / hrInstance / hrDeploy
ThunderComputeUSA2$0.79$1.58Deploy
RunPodglobal1$0.82—Deploy
Massed Computeus-central-32$0.86$1.72Deploy
QuantaCloudus-midwest-24$0.94$3.75Deploy
HyperstackCANADA-14$1.00$4.00Deploy

5 providers in stock, 16 offers (cheapest per provider shown). All L40 offers, price history and alerts

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when A30 drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the A30

The A30 suits deployments that prioritize 165 W TDP and NVLink connectivity for multi GPU scaling. Its 933 GB/s bandwidth and 24 GB HBM2 memory fit workloads where power limits constrain system design and interconnect speed matters more than raw FP32 capacity.

When to Choose the L40

The L40 fits scenarios that require 48 GB GDDR6 memory and 90.5 TFLOPS FP32 performance. Its support for dense FP8 at 362 TFLOPS and higher dense FP16 at 181.05 TFLOPS benefits inference and training tasks that gain from increased capacity and newer architecture features.

Use Cases

LLM Training
L40

The L40 supplies 48 GB memory that accommodates larger models compared with the A30 24 GB capacity.

LLM Inference
L40

Dense FP16 performance reaches 181.05 TFLOPS on the L40 versus 165 TFLOPS on the A30.

Fine-tuning
L40

The L40 48 GB VRAM and 90.5 TFLOPS FP32 rating enable efficient adaptation of models.

Stable Diffusion
L40

Double the memory on the L40 at 48 GB supports higher resolution generation workloads.

Scientific Computing
L40

FP32 throughput of 90.5 TFLOPS on the L40 surpasses the 10.3 TFLOPS rating of the A30.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FP32 performance of the L40?▾

The L40 achieves 90.5 TFLOPS in FP32.

Does the A30 support NVLink?▾

The A30 includes NVLink interconnect in addition to PCIe 4.0.

What is the TDP of each GPU?▾

The A30 TDP measures 165 W and the L40 TDP measures 300 W.

How do dense FP16 figures compare?▾

Dense FP16 measures 165 TFLOPS on the A30 and 181.05 TFLOPS on the L40.

Which GPU offers FP8 support?▾

The L40 publishes dense FP8 at 362 TFLOPS and sparse FP8 at 724 TFLOPS.

Which is cheaper to rent, the A30 or the L40?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the A30 and L40 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the A30 have compared to the L40?▾

The A30 has 24 GB of HBM2 memory. The L40 has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find A30 and L40 GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the A30 and the L40?▾

The A30 uses the Ampere architecture (2021) while the L40 uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The L40 delivers 1.1x the dense FP16 throughput (181.05 vs 165 TFLOPS, both without sparsity) while the A30 has 1.1x the memory bandwidth of the L40.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the A30 and the L40. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps