GPU comparison

A30 vs RTX 4500 Ada

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

AmperevsAda LovelaceUpdated 33 days ago

The A30 wins for the most common inference oriented use case because its 933 GB/s bandwidth and 165 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating deliver better data movement efficiency than the 432 GB/s and absent FP16 numbers on the RTX 4500 Ada.

A30 listed from $0.35/GPU/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecA30RTX 4500 Ada
TDP165W210W
VRAM24 GB24 GB
CUDA Cores3,5847,680
Memory TypeHBM2GDDR6
ArchitectureAmpereAda Lovelace
FP16 (dense)165 TFLOPSNot published
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
INT8 (dense)330 TOPSNot published
InterconnectNVLink, PCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor Cores224240
FP32 Performance10.3 TFLOPS39.6 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance5.2 TFLOPSNot published
Memory Bandwidth933 GB/s432 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)Not published634 TFLOPS
FP16 (with sparsity)330 TFLOPSNot published
INT8 (with sparsity)661 TOPSNot published

Performance Analysis

The A30 provides 165 TFLOPS FP16 dense performance while the RTX 4500 Ada publishes no FP16 figure. The A30 FP32 performance of 10.3 TFLOPS stands against 39.6 TFLOPS on the RTX 4500 Ada so workloads that rely on dense FP32 arithmetic receive higher throughput from the RTX 4500 Ada. Memory bandwidth of 933 GB/s on the A30 versus 432 GB/s on the RTX 4500 Ada allows the A30 to sustain larger batch sizes during memory intensive operations. The A30 further supplies 330 TOPS INT8 dense and 661 TOPS INT8 with sparsity while the RTX 4500 Ada supplies 634 TFLOPS FP8 with sparsity.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

A30

A30 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the A30 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX 4500 Ada

RTX 4500 Ada is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 4500 Ada rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when A30 drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the A30

The A30 suits deployments that require the 933 GB/s memory bandwidth or NVLink interconnect for multi GPU scaling. Its 165W TDP also reduces power draw relative to the 210W rating of the RTX 4500 Ada. Workloads that utilize 165 TFLOPS FP16 dense or 330 TOPS INT8 dense therefore align with the A30 specification set.

When to Choose the RTX 4500 Ada

The RTX 4500 Ada suits workloads that require the 39.6 TFLOPS FP32 rating for higher single precision throughput. Its 2023 architecture and 634 TFLOPS FP8 with sparsity figure support newer tensor operations not published for the A30. Users who prioritize FP32 performance over bandwidth therefore select the RTX 4500 Ada.

Use Cases

LLM Training
A30

The A30 supplies 165 TFLOPS FP16 dense together with 933 GB/s bandwidth that supports larger training batches.

LLM Inference
A30

The A30 330 TOPS INT8 dense rating and NVLink interconnect enable efficient multi GPU inference scaling.

Fine-tuning
A30

The A30 165 TFLOPS FP16 dense and 933 GB/s bandwidth accommodate fine tuning workloads that move substantial activation data.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 4500 Ada

The RTX 4500 Ada 39.6 TFLOPS FP32 rating accelerates diffusion model steps that rely on single precision arithmetic.

Scientific Computing
RTX 4500 Ada

The RTX 4500 Ada 39.6 TFLOPS FP32 rating exceeds the 10.3 TFLOPS FP32 rating of the A30.

Frequently Asked Questions

What memory bandwidth does the A30 provide?▾

The A30 provides 933 GB/s memory bandwidth from its HBM2 memory.

How does FP32 performance compare between the two GPUs?▾

The A30 delivers 10.3 TFLOPS FP32 while the RTX 4500 Ada delivers 39.6 TFLOPS FP32.

Does the A30 support NVLink?▾

The A30 supports NVLink interconnect in addition to PCIe 4.0.

What is the TDP of each GPU?▾

The A30 TDP is 165W and the RTX 4500 Ada TDP is 210W.

Which GPU offers FP8 performance figures?▾

The RTX 4500 Ada publishes 634 TFLOPS FP8 with sparsity while the A30 publishes no FP8 figure.

What INT8 performance does the A30 deliver?▾

The A30 delivers 330 TOPS INT8 dense and 661 TOPS INT8 with sparsity.

Which is cheaper to rent, the A30 or the RTX 4500 Ada?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the A30 and RTX 4500 Ada vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the A30 have compared to the RTX 4500 Ada?▾

The A30 has 24 GB of HBM2 memory. The RTX 4500 Ada has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find A30 and RTX 4500 Ada GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the A30 and the RTX 4500 Ada?▾

The A30 uses the Ampere architecture (2021) while the RTX 4500 Ada uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The A30 has 24 GB of HBM2 at 933 GB/s; the RTX 4500 Ada has 24 GB of GDDR6 at 432 GB/s, so the A30 has 2.2x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4500 Ada.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the A30 and the RTX 4500 Ada. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps