AWS vs Scaleway
AWS and Scaleway represent contrasting approaches in GPU cloud provisioning for ML/AI workloads. AWS, the market leader, offers unparalleled global scale with instances like P5 (H100 GPUs) deeply integrated into SageMaker for end-to-end ML pipelines, Trainium/Inferentia for cost-optimized training/inference, and features like spot instances for savings up to 90%. It's ideal for enterprises needing multi-AZ redundancy, compliance (including HIPAA), and ecosystem tools like EKS for Kubernetes orchestration. However, pricing complexity, high on-demand rates, and egress fees can inflate costs. Scaleway, a European provider, prioritizes data sovereignty with GDPR/HDS compliance and eco-friendly operations (100% renewable energy). Its Nabu AI Supercomputer provides dense GPU clusters (e.g., 4x H100 per node), alongside Instances like ROME (A100s). Billing is straightforward per-hour, appealing for predictable EU workloads, but lacks AWS's global footprint and managed ML services. Scaleway suits sovereignty-focused teams with integrated Object/Block storage and Kubernetes via Kapsule. AWS excels in large-scale, production-grade deployments requiring seamless scaling and integrations; Scaleway offers competitive pricing and lower latency for European users, with strong environmental credentials. Choice hinges on geography, scale, budget, and integration needs—AWS for global enterprises, Scaleway for EU-centric, cost-sensitive operations.
Our Recommendation
Choose AWS for large teams (50+ engineers) running enterprise-scale LLM training or production inference needing global redundancy, SageMaker for managed workflows, or Trainium for cost savings on massive jobs. It's suited to budgets over $10K/month where spot instances offset premiums, and HIPAA compliance is required. Opt for Scaleway with small-to-medium teams (under 20) prioritizing EU data residency, per-hour billing simplicity, and eco-impact—ideal for fine-tuning or batch jobs under $5K/month. Scaleway fits latency-sensitive European inference without AWS's egress costs. For hybrid needs, start with Scaleway for prototyping, migrate to AWS for scale; avoid Scaleway if global HA or advanced ML ops are critical.
Live Pricing
Compare real-time GPU offers from AWS and Scaleway
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QuantaCloud Partner | H100 / H200 · A100 · B200 / B300 32–1024+ GPUs · InfiniBand | ∞ | Custom configs | Multiple DCs | Reserved / cluster Get a quote in 24h | Available | ||
![]() AWS | NVIDIA Tesla T4 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 4 vCPU 16GB RAM | Virginia | $0.53/GPU/hr | |||
![]() AWS | NVIDIA Tesla T4 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 8 vCPU 32GB RAM | Virginia | $0.75/GPU/hr | |||
Scaleway | 8×NVIDIA L4 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 64 vCPU 384GB RAM | Paris | $0.90/GPU/hr $7.20/hr total (8×) | Sold Out | ||
Scaleway | 2×NVIDIA L4 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 16 vCPU 96GB RAM | Paris | $0.90/GPU/hr $1.80/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
Scaleway | 2×NVIDIA L4 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 16 vCPU 96GB RAM | Paris | $0.90/GPU/hr $1.80/hr total (2×) | Sold Out |


QuantaCloud
Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.
Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need — 16+ GPUs, reserved or cluster capacity — and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.
The dominant force in global cloud computing with deep integration of GPUs into its ecosystem for machine learning and other services.
Best For
Unique Features
- Proprietary silicon like Trainium and Inferentia chips
- Fully managed ML development environment with SageMaker
Limitations
- High cost relative to specialized clouds
- Complexity of pricing including egress fees
A major European cloud provider emphasizing data sovereignty and integrated services.
Best For
Unique Features
- Nabu AI Supercomputer
- Strong environmental credentials
Feature Comparison
| Feature | AWS | Scaleway |
|---|---|---|
| SSH | ||
| Jupyter Notebooks | ||
| Web Terminal | ||
| API | ||
| Kubernetes | ||
| Containers |
| Feature | AWS | Scaleway |
|---|---|---|
| Billing Increment | per-second | per-hour |
| Spot Instances | ||
| Reserved Instances | ||
| Prepaid Credits |
| Certification | AWS | Scaleway |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| GDPR | ||
| ISO 27001 |
| Feature | AWS | Scaleway |
|---|---|---|
| SLA | ||
| Enterprise Support | ||
| Discord Community |
Pricing Analysis
AWS employs per-second billing for EC2 GPU instances (e.g., p5.48xlarge H100 at ~$32.77/hour on-demand), with spot instances offering 50-90% discounts for interruptible workloads and Savings Plans/Reserved Instances for 30-70% off committed use. Egress fees ($0.09/GB inter-region) add complexity. Scaleway uses per-hour billing (e.g., ROME-4A100 at €3.60/hour, Nabu H100 clusters from €5.99/hour/node), no spot but volume discounts for reservations; simpler but less flexible for short bursts. AWS favors variable, bursty patterns (e.g., experiments); Scaleway suits steady, predictable runs, potentially 20-40% cheaper for EU on-demand without egress.
For small experiments/fine-tuning (<1 hour), Scaleway's per-hour minimum and lower base rates (€1-6/hour for A100 equiv.) yield better value, avoiding AWS's ramp-up costs. Large training runs (days-long) favor AWS spot/Trainium (up to 50% cheaper than GPU on-demand). Production batch inference benefits AWS Savings Plans for steady loads; real-time inference suits Scaleway's dense Nabu clusters for EU latency at fixed hourly rates. Overall, Scaleway wins on cost-per-flop for mid-scale EU jobs (20-50% savings); AWS for optimized, interruptible scale with ecosystem efficiencies.
Use Case Comparison
AWS
AWS shines with P4d/P5 instances (8x H100), Trainium clusters for 40-50% cost savings on FP16 training, SageMaker for distributed runs via SMDDP/TorchElastic, and spot for fault-tolerant jobs. Global AZs ensure 99.99% SLA; integrates with FSx Lustre for 100PB storage. Ideal for 100B+ param models but pricier on-demand.
Scaleway
Scaleway's Nabu Supercomputer (H100 pods up to 256 GPUs) supports large-scale training with NVLink/RoCE networking; per-hour billing suits long jobs. EU sovereignty aids regulated data, but lacks managed orchestration like SageMaker; scaling limited to Paris/DC5 regions.
AWS
AWS Inferentia (Inf2 instances) delivers 40-60% better price/perf than GPUs for batch; SageMaker Batch Transform handles autoscaling. Spot instances optimize costs for non-urgent queues; EBS/S3 integration streamlines data pipelines.
Scaleway
Scaleway GPUs (A100/H100) via Nabu excel for dense batch with fast local NVMe; per-hour fixed costs aid budgeting. Kubernetes Kapsule eases job scheduling, but no specialized inference silicon; strong for EU data pipelines.
AWS
AWS EC2 G5/Inf2 with low-latency ENIs, Lambda/SageMaker Endpoints for serverless scaling, and Global Accelerator for <100ms worldwide. Trainium2 upcoming for dynamic batching; robust autoscaling via ASGs.
Scaleway
Scaleway's low-latency EU networking (1-5ms intra-region) and Nabu H100s suit real-time; Elastic Metal bare-metal minimizes jitter. Kapsule Kubernetes aids deployments, but regional focus limits global reach.
AWS
AWS SageMaker Studio notebooks, spot A10G instances (~$1/hour), and JumpStart models speed iteration. Per-second billing perfect for short runs; but setup overhead for non-experts.
Scaleway
Scaleway's affordable A4000/A100 instances (€0.50-3/hour) and per-hour billing minimize waste for trials. Nabu for quick multi-GPU tests; simple console suits small teams, with EU snapshot storage.
Technical Comparison
AWS relies on virtualized EC2 Nitro with EBS/EFS storage, Elastic Fabric Adapter (400Gbps) for multi-GPU, and EKS for managed Kubernetes; supports Trainium/Inferentia ASICs. Global 30+ regions. Scaleway mixes virtual Instances and bare-metal Elastic Metal, with Block/Object storage (up to 100TB NVMe); Kapsule Kubernetes native. Nabu uses InfiniBand for clusters; focused on 3 EU regions (Paris, Amsterdam) emphasizing sovereignty/low-latency intra-EU.
AWS P5 achieves 2x H100 throughput via Trainium2 (upcoming), strong multi-node scaling (10k+ GPUs via Slurm); benchmarks show 95% scaling efficiency. Scaleway Nabu H100 pods hit 90% efficiency on RoCE-400Gbps, competitive single-node perf but fewer public multi-GPU benchmarks. AWS edges availability/diversity (A100/H100/V100); Scaleway reliable for EU, with eco-optimized cooling aiding sustained loads. Both support CUDA 12.x.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which provider offers spot instances for cost savings?▾
What is the minimum billing increment for each provider?▾
Which provider has better compliance certifications for enterprise use?▾
Which provider offers better development tools like Jupyter notebooks?▾
Which provider has better Kubernetes support for orchestration?▾
What is each provider best suited for?▾
Which provider offers reserved instances for long-term savings?▾
Which provider offers better enterprise support?▾
Which provider has better API and automation support?▾
Which provider has better container and Docker support?▾
What unique features differentiate these providers?▾
How do I get started with each provider?▾
Related Comparisons & Pages
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40GB on AWS - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB on AWS - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA H100 SXM5 on AWS - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA RTX A6000 on AWS - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA Tesla T4 on AWS - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA Tesla V100 16GB on AWS - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA Tesla V100 32GB on AWS - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA B300 SXM6 on Scaleway - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA H100 PCIe on Scaleway - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA H100 SXM5 on Scaleway - Pricing & Availability
Atlantic.net vs Scaleway: GPU Cloud Comparison
AWS vs Cirrascale: GPU Cloud Comparison
AWS vs CoreWeave: GPU Cloud Comparison
AWS vs Crusoe: GPU Cloud Comparison
AWS vs Denvr: GPU Cloud Comparison