GPU comparison

GH200 vs RTX 2070

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

HoppervsTuringUpdated 33 days ago

The GH200 wins for the most common use case of LLM training because its 989 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating, 96 GB VRAM, and 4000 GB/s bandwidth exceed the RTX 2070 29.9 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating, 8 GB VRAM, and 448 GB/s bandwidth by large margins.

GH200 listed from $1.99/GPU/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecGH200RTX 2070
TDP900W175W
VRAM96 GB8 GB
CUDA Cores16,8962,304
FP8 (dense)1,979 TFLOPSNot published
Memory TypeHBM3GDDR6
ArchitectureHopperTuring
FP16 (dense)989 TFLOPS29.9 TFLOPS
Form FactorsSXMPCIe
INT8 (dense)1,979 TOPS119.4 TOPS
InterconnectNVLink-C2C, PCIe 5.0PCIe 3.0
Tensor Cores528288
FP32 Performance67 TFLOPS7.5 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance34 TFLOPSNot published
Memory Bandwidth4,000 GB/s448 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)3,958 TFLOPSNot published
FP16 (with sparsity)1,979 TFLOPSNot published
INT8 (with sparsity)3,958 TOPSNot published

Performance Analysis

This difference allows the GH200 to complete matrix operations in training and inference workloads at far higher throughput when both figures are measured as dense. The GH200 memory bandwidth of 4000 GB/s compared with the RTX 2070 448 GB/s supports larger batch sizes during model execution because data movement occurs at a higher sustained rate.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

GH200

GH200 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the GH200 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX 2070

RTX 2070 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 2070 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when GH200 drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing H-series providers? We broker across all of them.

Hopper stock changes by the hour and prices differ by provider. If you need 16+ GPUs reserved or a cluster in the next 90 days, we quote H-series or B300 inventory at partner rates: one quote, 24h turnaround.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the GH200

The GH200 suits workloads that require the 96 GB HBM3 capacity and the 989 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating. Organizations running large model training or scientific simulations select the GH200 when the 4000 GB/s bandwidth and 67 TFLOPS FP32 rating become necessary for acceptable completion times.

When to Choose the RTX 2070

The RTX 2070 fits smaller inference tasks or development environments limited to the 175 W TDP and the 8 GB GDDR6 capacity. Users select the RTX 2070 when power constraints or PCIe form factor compatibility outweigh the need for the higher 989 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating of the GH200.

Use Cases

LLM Training
GH200

The GH200 supplies 989 TFLOPS FP16 dense and 96 GB VRAM while the RTX 2070 supplies only 29.9 TFLOPS FP16 dense and 8 GB VRAM.

LLM Inference
GH200

The GH200 4000 GB/s bandwidth and 989 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating enable larger concurrent requests than the RTX 2070 448 GB/s and 29.9 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating.

Fine-tuning
GH200

The GH200 67 TFLOPS FP32 and 96 GB capacity handle parameter updates at scale beyond the RTX 2070 7.5 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB capacity.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 2070

The RTX 2070 175 W TDP and PCIe form factor suffice for moderate image generation workloads that do not require the GH200 900 W TDP or 989 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating.

Scientific Computing
GH200

The GH200 67 TFLOPS FP32 and 4000 GB/s bandwidth accelerate numerical kernels more effectively than the RTX 2070 7.5 TFLOPS FP32 and 448 GB/s bandwidth.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does GH200 FP16 dense performance compare with RTX 2070 FP16 dense performance?▾

The GH200 reaches 989 TFLOPS FP16 dense while the RTX 2070 reaches 29.9 TFLOPS FP16 dense.

Which GPU offers higher memory bandwidth, the GH200 or the RTX 2070?▾

The GH200 provides 4000 GB/s while the RTX 2070 provides 448 GB/s.

What TDP values distinguish the GH200 from the RTX 2070?▾

The GH200 lists 900 W TDP and the RTX 2070 lists 175 W TDP.

How does FP32 performance differ between the two GPUs?▾

The GH200 delivers 67 TFLOPS FP32 and the RTX 2070 delivers 7.5 TFLOPS FP32.

Does the RTX 2070 publish an FP8 rating?▾

The RTX 2070 does not publish an FP8 rating while the GH200 lists 1979 TFLOPS FP8 dense.

Which is cheaper to rent, the GH200 or the RTX 2070?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the GH200 and RTX 2070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the GH200 have compared to the RTX 2070?▾

The GH200 has 96 GB of HBM3 memory. The RTX 2070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find GH200 and RTX 2070 GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the GH200 and the RTX 2070?▾

The GH200 uses the Hopper architecture (2023) while the RTX 2070 uses Turing (2018). The GH200 delivers 33.1x the dense FP16 throughput (989 vs 29.9 TFLOPS, both without sparsity) and 8.9x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 2070.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the GH200 and the RTX 2070. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps