Specifications Compared
| Spec | GH200 | RTX 4000 Ada |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 900W | 130W |
| VRAM | 96 GB | 20 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 16,896 | 6,144 |
| FP8 (dense) | 1,979 TFLOPS | Not published |
| Memory Type | HBM3 | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Hopper | Ada Lovelace |
| FP16 (dense) | 989 TFLOPS | Not published |
| Form Factors | SXM | PCIe |
| INT8 (dense) | 1,979 TOPS | Not published |
| Interconnect | NVLink-C2C, PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Tensor Cores | 528 | 192 |
| FP32 Performance | 67 TFLOPS | 26.7 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 34 TFLOPS | Not published |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4,000 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| FP8 (with sparsity) | 3,958 TFLOPS | 427.6 TFLOPS |
| FP16 (with sparsity) | 1,979 TFLOPS | Not published |
| INT8 (with sparsity) | 3,958 TOPS | Not published |
Performance Analysis
The GH200 delivers FP16 dense performance of 989 TFLOPS while the RTX 4000 Ada does not publish an FP16 figure. FP32 performance of 67 TFLOPS on the GH200 exceeds the 26.7 TFLOPS on the RTX 4000 Ada by a ratio of 2.5 times. This FP16 to FP32 delta on the GH200 supports accelerated training and inference operations where lower precision formats reduce computation time. Memory bandwidth of 4000 GB/s on the GH200 compared to 360 GB/s on the RTX 4000 Ada enables larger batch sizes during model execution. The GH200 FP8 dense figure of 1979 TFLOPS stands against the RTX 4000 Ada FP8 with sparsity figure of 427.6 TFLOPS. The GH200 INT8 dense rating of 1979 TOPS further differentiates it for integer workloads.
Current On-Demand Offers
Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.
GH200
GH200 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the GH200 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.
RTX 4000 Ada
RTX 4000 Ada is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 4000 Ada rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.
Notify me when GH200 drops below a price
One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.
QuantaCloud
Comparing H-series providers? We broker across all of them.
Hopper stock changes by the hour and prices differ by provider. If you need 16+ GPUs reserved or a cluster in the next 90 days, we quote H-series or B300 inventory at partner rates: one quote, 24h turnaround.
When to Choose the GH200
The GH200 suits scenarios that require 96 GB HBM3 memory and 4000 GB/s bandwidth for large model handling. Its FP16 dense performance of 989 TFLOPS and FP32 performance of 67 TFLOPS support extended training sessions. The 900W TDP fits environments with sufficient power infrastructure and NVLink-C2C interconnect.
When to Choose the RTX 4000 Ada
The RTX 4000 Ada fits scenarios that require 20 GB GDDR6 memory and 130W TDP for compact deployments. Its FP32 performance of 26.7 TFLOPS and FP8 with sparsity performance of 427.6 TFLOPS address moderate inference tasks. The PCIe form factor and PCIe 4.0 interconnect suit standard server configurations.
Use Cases
The GH200 supplies 96 GB HBM3 memory and FP16 dense performance of 989 TFLOPS to handle large models.
The GH200 provides FP8 dense performance of 1979 TFLOPS and 4000 GB/s bandwidth for efficient token processing.
The GH200 offers 96 GB HBM3 memory and INT8 dense performance of 1979 TOPS to support parameter updates.
The RTX 4000 Ada delivers FP8 with sparsity performance of 427.6 TFLOPS at 130W TDP for image generation tasks.
The GH200 supplies FP32 performance of 67 TFLOPS and 4000 GB/s bandwidth for simulation workloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
What memory configurations distinguish the GH200 from the RTX 4000 Ada?▾
The GH200 features 96 GB HBM3 memory while the RTX 4000 Ada features 20 GB GDDR6 memory. Bandwidth differs at 4000 GB/s versus 360 GB/s.
How does FP32 performance compare between the two GPUs?▾
The GH200 achieves 67 TFLOPS in FP32 while the RTX 4000 Ada achieves 26.7 TFLOPS in FP32.
Which GPU supports higher precision tensor operations?▾
The GH200 supports FP16 dense at 989 TFLOPS and FP8 dense at 1979 TFLOPS. The RTX 4000 Ada publishes FP8 with sparsity at 427.6 TFLOPS.
What power and form factor differences exist?▾
The GH200 operates at 900W TDP in SXM form factor with NVLink-C2C. The RTX 4000 Ada operates at 130W TDP in PCIe form factor with PCIe 4.0.
Does the RTX 4000 Ada publish FP16 performance figures?▾
The RTX 4000 Ada does not publish FP16 performance figures. The GH200 publishes FP16 dense at 989 TFLOPS.
Which is cheaper to rent, the GH200 or the RTX 4000 Ada?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the GH200 and RTX 4000 Ada vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the GH200 have compared to the RTX 4000 Ada?▾
The GH200 has 96 GB of HBM3 memory. The RTX 4000 Ada has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find GH200 and RTX 4000 Ada GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the GH200 and the RTX 4000 Ada?▾
The GH200 uses the Hopper architecture (2023) while the RTX 4000 Ada uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The GH200 has 96 GB of HBM3 at 4,000 GB/s; the RTX 4000 Ada has 20 GB of GDDR6 at 360 GB/s, so the GH200 has 11.1x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4000 Ada.
Rent these GPUs
Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.
Related comparisons
How this page is made
- Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the GH200 and the RTX 4000 Ada. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
- Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
- The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
- Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.
Next steps
- Rent GH200 Grace HopperEvery current offer by provider, daily price history and a price alert.
- Rent RTX 4000 ADAEvery current offer by provider, daily price history and a price alert.
- GPU price indexHow on-demand prices for the major GPUs have moved, updated daily.
- All GPUsEvery GPU we track, with current lows and provider counts.