GPU comparison

GTX 1070 vs RTX A2000

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

PascalvsAmpereUpdated 33 days ago

The RTX A2000 serves as the stronger choice for the most common use case of FP32 based inference because its 8 TFLOPS FP32 rating exceeds the GTX 1070 6.5 TFLOPS figure while also providing FP16 with sparsity at 63.9 TFLOPS.

RTX A2000 listed from $0.50/GPU/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecGTX 1070RTX A2000
TDP150W70W
VRAM8 GB6-12 GB
CUDA Cores1,9203,328
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
ArchitecturePascalAmpere
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
InterconnectPCIe 3.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor CoresNot published104
FP32 Performance6.5 TFLOPS8 TFLOPS
Memory Bandwidth256 GB/s288 GB/s
FP16 (with sparsity)Not published63.9 TFLOPS

Performance Analysis

FP32 performance shows the RTX A2000 at 8 TFLOPS against the GTX 1070 at 6.5 TFLOPS. The RTX A2000 also lists FP16 throughput of 63.9 TFLOPS with sparsity while the GTX 1070 does not publish an FP16 figure. Memory bandwidth of 288 GB per second on the RTX A2000 exceeds the 256 GB per second on the GTX 1070 and can support larger batch sizes during workloads that move substantial data volumes. TDP of 70 W on the RTX A2000 remains lower than the 150 W TDP on the GTX 1070 which influences sustained operation limits.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

GTX 1070

GTX 1070 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the GTX 1070 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX A2000

RTX A2000 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX A2000 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when GTX 1070 drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the GTX 1070

The GTX 1070 suits scenarios that require its published 8 GB GDDR5 capacity paired with 6.5 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. Its PCIe 3.0 interconnect matches systems that lack PCIe 4.0 support.

When to Choose the RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 fits workloads that benefit from its 8 TFLOPS FP32 rating and 63.9 TFLOPS FP16 with sparsity. Lower TDP of 70 W and higher memory bandwidth of 288 GB per second further align with power constrained or bandwidth sensitive tasks.

Use Cases

LLM Training
RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 supplies 63.9 TFLOPS FP16 with sparsity and 8 TFLOPS FP32 which exceed the GTX 1070 published figures.

LLM Inference
RTX A2000

FP32 throughput of 8 TFLOPS on the RTX A2000 surpasses the 6.5 TFLOPS on the GTX 1070.

Fine-tuning
RTX A2000

Memory bandwidth reaches 288 GB per second on the RTX A2000 compared to 256 GB per second on the GTX 1070.

Stable Diffusion
Either

Both GPUs provide PCIe form factors and comparable VRAM ranges though the RTX A2000 adds FP16 with sparsity at 63.9 TFLOPS.

Scientific Computing
RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 TDP of 70 W stays below the GTX 1070 TDP of 150 W while delivering 8 TFLOPS FP32.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FP32 rating of the GTX 1070?▾

The GTX 1070 lists FP32 throughput at 6.5 TFLOPS. This figure stands as the primary published tensor performance metric for the card.

Does the RTX A2000 support FP16?▾

The RTX A2000 provides FP16 throughput of 63.9 TFLOPS with sparsity. No dense FP16 value appears in the published specifications.

How does memory bandwidth compare between these GPUs?▾

The GTX 1070 reaches 256 GB per second while the RTX A2000 reaches 288 GB per second. This difference affects data movement rates during compute tasks.

What TDP values apply to the GTX 1070 and RTX A2000?▾

The GTX 1070 carries a TDP of 150 W. The RTX A2000 carries a TDP of 70 W.

Which is cheaper to rent, the GTX 1070 or the RTX A2000?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the GTX 1070 and RTX A2000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the GTX 1070 have compared to the RTX A2000?▾

The GTX 1070 has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory. The RTX A2000 has 6 to 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find GTX 1070 and RTX A2000 GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1070 and the RTX A2000?▾

The GTX 1070 uses the Pascal architecture (2016) while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere (2021). The GTX 1070 has 8 GB of GDDR5 at 256 GB/s; the RTX A2000 has 6-12 GB of GDDR6 at 288 GB/s, so the RTX A2000 has 1.1x the memory bandwidth of the GTX 1070.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the GTX 1070 and the RTX A2000. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps