GPU comparison

GTX 1080 vs RTX A4000

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

PascalvsAmpereUpdated 34 days ago

The RTX A4000 wins for the most common use case of FP32 dense workloads because it supplies 19.2 TFLOPS compared with 8.9 TFLOPS on the GTX 1080 while also providing higher memory bandwidth and lower TDP.

GTX 1080 from $0.45/GPU/hrRTX A4000 from $0.15/GPU/hr

Right now, from live stock

  • Cheapest right now: RTX A4000 at $0.15/hr on Hyperstack

    Deploy
  • Most providers in stock: RTX A4000 (2)

    See all offers

Specifications Compared

SpecGTX 1080RTX A4000
TDP180W140W
VRAM8-11 GB16-20 GB
CUDA Cores2,5606,144
Memory TypeGDDR5XGDDR6
ArchitecturePascalAmpere
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
InterconnectPCIe 3.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor CoresNot published192
FP32 Performance8.9 TFLOPS19.2 TFLOPS
Memory Bandwidth320 GB/s448 GB/s
FP16 (with sparsity)Not published153.4 TFLOPS

Performance Analysis

The FP32 figures of 8.9 TFLOPS on the GTX 1080 and 19.2 TFLOPS on the RTX A4000 represent dense performance in both cases and indicate that the RTX A4000 supplies more than double the dense FP32 throughput. This delta affects training and inference by allowing larger models or faster iteration on the RTX A4000 when dense FP32 operations dominate. Memory bandwidth of 320 GB per s on the GTX 1080 versus 448 GB per s on the RTX A4000 influences batch sizes because higher bandwidth supports larger data transfers per cycle without increasing VRAM capacity alone. The RTX A4000 also lists 153.4 TFLOPS FP16 with sparsity while the GTX 1080 lists no FP16 value so comparisons remain limited to dense FP32 figures only.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

GTX 1080

ProviderRegionGPUsPer GPU / hrInstance / hrDeploy
LeaderGPUThe Netherlands4$0.45$1.80Deploy

1 provider in stock, 2 offers (cheapest per provider shown). All GTX 1080 offers, price history and alerts

RTX A4000

ProviderRegionGPUsPer GPU / hrInstance / hrDeploy
HyperstackNORWAY-11$0.15—Deploy
Paperspaceny22$0.76$1.52Deploy

2 providers in stock, 7 offers (cheapest per provider shown). All RTX A4000 offers, price history and alerts

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when GTX 1080 drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold. Cheapest right now: $0.45/GPU-hr.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the GTX 1080

The GTX 1080 fits scenarios that require only 8.9 TFLOPS dense FP32 and operate within PCIe 3.0 slots where the 180 W TDP remains acceptable. Workloads that stay below 8 to 11 GB VRAM and do not require the 448 GB per s bandwidth of newer cards can use the GTX 1080 without performance loss relative to its specifications.

When to Choose the RTX A4000

Workloads that run on PCIe 4.0 interconnects and stay within the 140 W TDP envelope gain from these higher specification values.

Use Cases

LLM Training
RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 supplies 19.2 TFLOPS dense FP32 and 16 to 20 GB VRAM which exceed the GTX 1080 values of 8.9 TFLOPS and 8 to 11 GB.

LLM Inference
RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 supplies 153.4 TFLOPS FP16 with sparsity and 448 GB per s bandwidth which exceed GTX 1080 specifications.

Fine-tuning
RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 supplies 19.2 TFLOPS dense FP32 with 140 W TDP allowing larger batches than the GTX 1080 8.9 TFLOPS and 180 W TDP.

Stable Diffusion
RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 supplies 16 to 20 GB VRAM and 448 GB per s bandwidth which support higher resolution outputs than the GTX 1080 limits.

Scientific Computing
Either

Both GPUs provide published dense FP32 figures so either meets basic FP32 requirements when VRAM fits within 8 to 11 GB.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FP32 performance difference between GTX 1080 and RTX A4000?▾

The GTX 1080 lists 8.9 TFLOPS dense FP32 while the RTX A4000 lists 19.2 TFLOPS dense FP32.

What are the TDP ratings for these GPUs?▾

The GTX 1080 TDP is 180 W and the RTX A4000 TDP is 140 W.

Which interconnect does each card use?▾

The GTX 1080 uses PCIe 3.0 and the RTX A4000 uses PCIe 4.0.

Does the RTX A4000 list an FP16 figure?▾

The RTX A4000 lists 153.4 TFLOPS FP16 with sparsity while the GTX 1080 lists no FP16 value.

Which is cheaper to rent, the GTX 1080 or the RTX A4000?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the GTX 1080 and RTX A4000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the GTX 1080 have compared to the RTX A4000?▾

The GTX 1080 has 8 to 11 GB of GDDR5X memory. The RTX A4000 has 16 to 20 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find GTX 1080 and RTX A4000 GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1080 and the RTX A4000?▾

The GTX 1080 uses the Pascal architecture (2016) while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere (2021). The GTX 1080 has 8-11 GB of GDDR5X at 320 GB/s; the RTX A4000 has 16-20 GB of GDDR6 at 448 GB/s, so the RTX A4000 has 1.4x the memory bandwidth of the GTX 1080.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the GTX 1080 and the RTX A4000. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps