GPU comparison

L4 vs RTX 3070

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

Ada LovelacevsAmpereUpdated 32 days ago

The L4 wins for the most common AI inference and training scenarios because its 24 GB VRAM and 121 TFLOPS FP16 dense exceed the RTX 3070 specifications while consuming only 72W TDP.

L4 listed from $0.33/GPU/hrRTX 3070 listed from $0.13/GPU/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecL4RTX 3070
TDP72W220W
VRAM24 GB8 GB
CUDA Cores7,4245,888
FP8 (dense)242 TFLOPSNot published
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAmpere
FP16 (dense)121 TFLOPS40.6 TFLOPS
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
INT8 (dense)242 TOPS162.6 TOPS
InterconnectPCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor Cores232184
FP32 Performance30.3 TFLOPS20.3 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance0.5 TFLOPSNot published
Memory Bandwidth300 GB/s448 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)485 TFLOPSNot published
FP16 (with sparsity)242 TFLOPS81.3 TFLOPS
INT8 (with sparsity)485 TOPS325.2 TOPS

Performance Analysis

The FP16 dense figure of 121 TFLOPS on the L4 exceeds the 40.6 TFLOPS dense FP16 on the RTX 3070 by a factor of three. The FP32 performance of 30.3 TFLOPS on the L4 exceeds the 20.3 TFLOPS on the RTX 3070. The ratio of FP16 dense to FP32 equals four on the L4 and two on the RTX 3070. The L4 supplies 242 TOPS in INT8 dense while the RTX 3070 supplies 162.6 TOPS in INT8 dense. Memory bandwidth of 300 GB/s on the L4 limits batch sizes relative to the 448 GB/s on the RTX 3070 in memory intensive operations.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

L4

L4 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the L4 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX 3070

RTX 3070 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 3070 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when L4 drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the L4

The L4 suits deployments that require 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and a TDP of 72W for sustained inference tasks. Its 121 TFLOPS FP16 dense and 242 TFLOPS FP16 with sparsity support larger models than the RTX 3070 can accommodate. The PCIe form factor and 300 GB/s bandwidth fit power constrained environments.

When to Choose the RTX 3070

Its 40.6 TFLOPS FP16 dense and 20.3 TFLOPS FP32 allow certain parallel compute jobs where bandwidth outweighs total VRAM. The 220W TDP fits systems already provisioned for higher power draw.

Use Cases

LLM Training
L4

The L4 supplies 24 GB GDDR6 and 121 TFLOPS FP16 dense to handle larger models than the 8 GB on the RTX 3070.

LLM Inference
L4

The L4 delivers 242 TOPS INT8 dense and 72W TDP for efficient serving compared to 162.6 TOPS INT8 dense on the RTX 3070.

Fine-tuning
L4

The L4 provides 24 GB VRAM and 30.3 TFLOPS FP32 to support parameter updates beyond the 8 GB limit of the RTX 3070.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 3070

Scientific Computing
Either

The L4 supplies higher FP32 at 30.3 TFLOPS with lower TDP while the RTX 3070 supplies higher bandwidth at 448 GB/s.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FP16 dense performance of each GPU?▾

The L4 reaches 121 TFLOPS in FP16 dense. The RTX 3070 reaches 40.6 TFLOPS in FP16 dense.

How does TDP differ between the L4 and RTX 3070?▾

The L4 operates at 72W TDP. The RTX 3070 operates at 220W TDP.

Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?▾

The RTX 3070 reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth. The L4 reaches 300 GB/s memory bandwidth.

What FP32 performance do the GPUs deliver?▾

The L4 delivers 30.3 TFLOPS in FP32. The RTX 3070 delivers 20.3 TFLOPS in FP32.

How do the INT8 dense figures compare?▾

The L4 reaches 242 TOPS in INT8 dense. The RTX 3070 reaches 162.6 TOPS in INT8 dense.

Which is cheaper to rent, the L4 or the RTX 3070?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the L4 and RTX 3070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the L4 have compared to the RTX 3070?▾

The L4 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find L4 and RTX 3070 GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the L4 and the RTX 3070?▾

The L4 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture (2023) while the RTX 3070 uses Ampere (2020). The L4 delivers 3.0x the dense FP16 throughput (121 vs 40.6 TFLOPS, both without sparsity) while the RTX 3070 has 1.5x the memory bandwidth of the L4.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the L4 and the RTX 3070. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps