GPU comparison

MI250X vs RTX 3080

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

CDNA 2vsAmpereUpdated 31 days ago

The MI250X wins for the most common use case of LLM training because its 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 and 128 GB memory exceed the 59.5 TFLOPS dense FP16 and 12 GB memory of the RTX 3080 by clear margins.

MI250X listed from $1.28/GPU/hrRTX 3080 listed from $0.13/GPU/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecMI250XRTX 3080
TDP560W320W
VRAM128 GB10-12 GB
CUDA CoresNot published8,704
Memory TypeHBM2eGDDR6X
ArchitectureCDNA 2Ampere
FP16 (dense)383 TFLOPS59.5 TFLOPS
Form FactorsOAMPCIe
INT8 (dense)383 TOPS238 TOPS
InterconnectInfinity Fabric, PCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor CoresNot published272
FP32 Performance47.9 TFLOPS29.8 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance47.9 TFLOPSNot published
Memory Bandwidth3,277 GB/s760 GB/s
FP16 (with sparsity)Not published119 TFLOPS
INT8 (with sparsity)Not published476 TOPS

Performance Analysis

Dense FP16 performance reaches 383 TFLOPS on the MI250X against 59.5 TFLOPS dense FP16 on the RTX 3080 so the MI250X sustains larger batch sizes during training. FP32 throughput stands at 47.9 TFLOPS on the MI250X versus 29.8 TFLOPS on the RTX 3080 which favors the MI250X for precision sensitive scientific workloads. Memory bandwidth of 3277 GB/s on the MI250X compared with 760 GB/s on the RTX 3080 allows the MI250X to move data for models that exceed the 12 GB limit of the RTX 3080. Dense INT8 figures of 383 TOPS on the MI250X versus 238 TOPS on the RTX 3080 further separate inference throughput when sparsity is not applied.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

MI250X

MI250X is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the MI250X rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX 3080

RTX 3080 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 3080 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when MI250X drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the MI250X

The MI250X suits workloads that require 128 GB HBM2e capacity and 3277 GB/s bandwidth such as large scale scientific computing. Its 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 rating and Infinity Fabric interconnect support multi GPU scaling beyond the limits of a single 12 GB card.

When to Choose the RTX 3080

The RTX 3080 fits environments constrained to 320 W TDP and PCIe form factor where 59.5 TFLOPS dense FP16 meets smaller model requirements. Its 10 to 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 760 GB/s bandwidth align with consumer scale inference tasks that stay within those bounds.

Use Cases

LLM Training
MI250X

The MI250X supplies 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 and 128 GB memory that accommodate models larger than the 12 GB limit of the RTX 3080.

LLM Inference
MI250X

Dense INT8 performance of 383 TOPS on the MI250X exceeds 238 TOPS on the RTX 3080 while its bandwidth supports sustained throughput.

Fine-tuning
MI250X

The MI250X 3277 GB/s bandwidth and 47.9 TFLOPS FP32 rating enable larger batch fine tuning than the RTX 3080 760 GB/s and 29.8 TFLOPS FP32.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 3080

The RTX 3080 320 W TDP and PCIe form factor match consumer deployment where 59.5 TFLOPS dense FP16 suffices for typical image sizes.

Scientific Computing
MI250X

The MI250X 47.9 TFLOPS FP32 and 128 GB memory handle large scientific datasets beyond the RTX 3080 29.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 12 GB capacity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FP16 performance difference between MI250X and RTX 3080?▾

The MI250X reaches 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 while the RTX 3080 reaches 59.5 TFLOPS dense FP16.

What TDP values are listed for these GPUs?▾

The MI250X lists 560 W TDP and the RTX 3080 lists 320 W TDP.

Which GPU offers higher memory bandwidth?▾

The MI250X provides 3277 GB/s bandwidth compared with 760 GB/s on the RTX 3080.

Do both GPUs support the same interconnect?▾

The MI250X includes Infinity Fabric while the RTX 3080 uses PCIe 4.0.

What FP32 ratings appear in the specifications?▾

The MI250X lists 47.9 TFLOPS FP32 and the RTX 3080 lists 29.8 TFLOPS FP32.

Which is cheaper to rent, the MI250X or the RTX 3080?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the MI250X and RTX 3080 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the MI250X have compared to the RTX 3080?▾

The MI250X has 128 GB of HBM2e memory. The RTX 3080 has 10 to 12 GB of GDDR6X memory.

Can I find MI250X and RTX 3080 GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the MI250X and the RTX 3080?▾

The MI250X uses the CDNA 2 architecture (2021) while the RTX 3080 uses Ampere (2020). The MI250X delivers 6.4x the dense FP16 throughput (383 vs 59.5 TFLOPS, both without sparsity) and 4.3x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3080.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the MI250X and the RTX 3080. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps