GPU comparison

MI250X vs RTX 4000 Ada

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

CDNA 2vsAda LovelaceUpdated 33 days ago

The MI250X wins for the most common large model training use case. Its 128 GB VRAM, 3277 GB/s bandwidth, and 383 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating exceed the corresponding RTX 4000 Ada specifications in every published dense metric.

MI250X listed from $1.28/GPU/hrRTX 4000 Ada listed from $0.28/GPU/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecMI250XRTX 4000 Ada
TDP560W130W
VRAM128 GB20 GB
CUDA CoresNot published6,144
Memory TypeHBM2eGDDR6
ArchitectureCDNA 2Ada Lovelace
FP16 (dense)383 TFLOPSNot published
Form FactorsOAMPCIe
INT8 (dense)383 TOPSNot published
InterconnectInfinity Fabric, PCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor CoresNot published192
FP32 Performance47.9 TFLOPS26.7 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance47.9 TFLOPSNot published
Memory Bandwidth3,277 GB/s360 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)Not published427.6 TFLOPS

Performance Analysis

The MI250X delivers 383 TFLOPS in FP16 dense and 47.9 TFLOPS in FP32. The RTX 4000 Ada provides no FP16 figure and 26.7 TFLOPS in FP32. The FP16 dense figure on the MI250X supports larger scale training operations compared with FP32 alone. Memory bandwidth of 3277 GB/s on the MI250X permits larger batch sizes than the 360 GB/s on the RTX 4000 Ada. The RTX 4000 Ada lists FP8 with sparsity at 427.6 TFLOPS while the MI250X lists INT8 dense at 383 TOPS. These ratios indicate the MI250X sustains higher throughput in dense low precision tasks while the RTX 4000 Ada offers a sparse FP8 option where published.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

MI250X

MI250X is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the MI250X rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX 4000 Ada

RTX 4000 Ada is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 4000 Ada rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when MI250X drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the MI250X

The MI250X suits workloads that require 128 GB VRAM and 3277 GB/s bandwidth. Scientific computing tasks benefit from the 383 TFLOPS FP16 dense rating and 47.9 TFLOPS FP32 rating. Infinity Fabric interconnect further supports multi GPU scaling in OAM form factor systems.

When to Choose the RTX 4000 Ada

The RTX 4000 Ada fits deployments limited to 130W TDP and PCIe form factor. Its 20 GB GDDR6 configuration and 360 GB/s bandwidth serve lighter inference or fine tuning jobs. The 427.6 TFLOPS FP8 with sparsity rating provides an option for sparse accelerated tasks in constrained power environments.

Use Cases

LLM Training
MI250X

The MI250X supplies 128 GB VRAM and 383 TFLOPS FP16 dense for large batch training runs.

LLM Inference
MI250X

The MI250X provides 3277 GB/s bandwidth and 383 TOPS INT8 dense to sustain high throughput inference.

Fine-tuning
Either

Both GPUs handle fine tuning though the MI250X offers greater headroom with 128 GB VRAM while the RTX 4000 Ada operates at lower 130W TDP.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 4000 Ada

The RTX 4000 Ada delivers 427.6 TFLOPS FP8 with sparsity in a 130W TDP PCIe card suitable for image generation pipelines.

Scientific Computing
MI250X

The MI250X supplies 47.9 TFLOPS FP32 and 128 GB HBM2e memory for large scale simulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What FP32 performance do the MI250X and RTX 4000 Ada provide?▾

The MI250X reaches 47.9 TFLOPS FP32 and the RTX 4000 Ada reaches 26.7 TFLOPS FP32.

Which GPU offers higher memory bandwidth?▾

The MI250X offers 3277 GB/s bandwidth compared with 360 GB/s on the RTX 4000 Ada.

What is the TDP of each GPU?▾

The MI250X lists 560W TDP and the RTX 4000 Ada lists 130W TDP.

Does the RTX 4000 Ada publish an FP16 figure?▾

No FP16 rating appears for the RTX 4000 Ada while the MI250X lists 383 TFLOPS FP16 dense.

What interconnect options exist for each card?▾

The MI250X supports Infinity Fabric and PCIe 4.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada supports PCIe 4.0.

Which is cheaper to rent, the MI250X or the RTX 4000 Ada?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the MI250X and RTX 4000 Ada vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the MI250X have compared to the RTX 4000 Ada?▾

The MI250X has 128 GB of HBM2e memory. The RTX 4000 Ada has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find MI250X and RTX 4000 Ada GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the MI250X and the RTX 4000 Ada?▾

The MI250X uses the CDNA 2 architecture (2021) while the RTX 4000 Ada uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The MI250X has 128 GB of HBM2e at 3,277 GB/s; the RTX 4000 Ada has 20 GB of GDDR6 at 360 GB/s, so the MI250X has 9.1x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4000 Ada.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the MI250X and the RTX 4000 Ada. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps