GPU comparison

MI250X vs RTX 6000 Ada

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

CDNA 2vsAda LovelaceUpdated 33 days ago

The MI250X is the stronger choice for the most common large model training use case because its 128 GB memory and 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 rating accommodate bigger batches and deliver higher dense throughput than the RTX 6000 Ada.

MI250X listed from $1.28/GPU/hrRTX 6000 Ada listed from $0.79/GPU/hr

Right now, from live stock

  • Cheapest right now: RTX 6000 Ada at $0.79/hr on Massed Compute

    Deploy
  • Most providers in stock: RTX 6000 Ada (3)

    See all offers

Specifications Compared

SpecMI250XRTX 6000 Ada
TDP560W300W
VRAM128 GB48 GB
CUDA CoresNot published18,176
FP8 (dense)Not published728.5 TFLOPS
Memory TypeHBM2eGDDR6
ArchitectureCDNA 2Ada Lovelace
FP16 (dense)383 TFLOPS364 TFLOPS
Form FactorsOAMPCIe
INT8 (dense)383 TOPS728.5 TOPS
InterconnectInfinity Fabric, PCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor CoresNot published568
FP32 Performance47.9 TFLOPS91.1 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance47.9 TFLOPSNot published
Memory Bandwidth3,277 GB/s960 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)Not published1,457 TFLOPS
FP16 (with sparsity)Not published728 TFLOPS
INT8 (with sparsity)Not published1,457 TOPS

Performance Analysis

The MI250X records 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 and 47.9 TFLOPS FP32. The RTX 6000 Ada records 364 TFLOPS dense FP16 and 91.1 TFLOPS FP32. The dense FP16 advantage of the MI250X supports faster iteration in training workloads that rely on dense tensor operations while the FP32 advantage of the RTX 6000 Ada favors precision sensitive scientific codes. Memory bandwidth of 3277 GB/s on the MI250X versus 960 GB/s on the RTX 6000 Ada permits substantially larger batch sizes before data movement becomes the limiter.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

MI250X

MI250X is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the MI250X rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX 6000 Ada

ProviderRegionGPUsPer GPU / hrInstance / hrDeploy
Massed Computeus-central-31$0.79—Deploy
QuantaCloudus-midwest-21$0.79—Deploy
LeaderGPUThe Netherlands8$0.91$7.29Deploy

3 providers in stock, 6 offers (cheapest per provider shown). All RTX 6000 Ada offers, price history and alerts

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when MI250X drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the MI250X

The MI250X suits workloads that require the full 128 GB memory capacity and 3277 GB/s bandwidth such as training models that exceed 48 GB per device. Its 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 rating further accelerates dense matrix operations in large scale scientific computing.

When to Choose the RTX 6000 Ada

The RTX 6000 Ada suits deployments constrained to 300 W TDP and standard PCIe slots where its 91.1 TFLOPS FP32 rating delivers higher throughput than the 47.9 TFLOPS of the MI250X. Its support for sparsity also benefits inference pipelines that can exploit the 728 TFLOPS sparse FP16 rating.

Use Cases

LLM Training
MI250X

The MI250X supplies 128 GB memory and 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 which together support larger models than the 48 GB limit of the RTX 6000 Ada.

LLM Inference
RTX 6000 Ada

The RTX 6000 Ada provides 728 TFLOPS sparse FP16 and a 300 W TDP that fits power limited inference servers more readily than the 560 W MI250X.

Fine-tuning
MI250X

The MI250X 3277 GB/s bandwidth and 128 GB capacity allow fine tuning runs with batch sizes that exceed the 960 GB/s and 48 GB of the RTX 6000 Ada.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 6000 Ada

The RTX 6000 Ada 91.1 TFLOPS FP32 rating exceeds the 47.9 TFLOPS of the MI250X and its lower 300 W TDP suits continuous image generation workloads.

Scientific Computing
RTX 6000 Ada

The RTX 6000 Ada delivers 91.1 TFLOPS FP32 which is nearly double the 47.9 TFLOPS FP32 of the MI250X for precision heavy simulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the dense FP16 rating of each GPU?▾

The MI250X achieves 383 TFLOPS dense FP16 and the RTX 6000 Ada achieves 364 TFLOPS dense FP16.

Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?▾

The RTX 6000 Ada has 91.1 TFLOPS FP32 compared with 47.9 TFLOPS FP32 on the MI250X.

What are the TDP values for the MI250X and RTX 6000 Ada?▾

The MI250X TDP is 560 W and the RTX 6000 Ada TDP is 300 W.

How does memory bandwidth differ between the two GPUs?▾

The MI250X provides 3277 GB/s bandwidth while the RTX 6000 Ada provides 960 GB/s bandwidth.

Which is cheaper to rent, the MI250X or the RTX 6000 Ada?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the MI250X and RTX 6000 Ada vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the MI250X have compared to the RTX 6000 Ada?▾

The MI250X has 128 GB of HBM2e memory. The RTX 6000 Ada has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find MI250X and RTX 6000 Ada GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the MI250X and the RTX 6000 Ada?▾

The MI250X uses the CDNA 2 architecture (2021) while the RTX 6000 Ada uses Ada Lovelace (2022). The MI250X delivers 1.1x the dense FP16 throughput (383 vs 364 TFLOPS, both without sparsity) and 3.4x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 6000 Ada.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the MI250X and the RTX 6000 Ada. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps