Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 2000 Ada

The 57 TFLOPS dense FP16 rating on the Quadro RTX 4000 exceeds any published dense FP16 value for the RTX 2000 Ada and supports faster dense matrix operations in compatible training pipelines. The RTX 2000 Ada FP32 rating of 12 TFLOPS exceeds the Quadro RTX 4000 FP32 rating of 7.1 TFLOPS and therefore delivers higher throughput in single precision scientific workloads. Memory bandwidth of 416 GB/s on the Quadro RTX 4000 exceeds the 224 GB/s rating on the RTX 2000 Ada and permits larger batch sizes when data movement limits performance. The 191.9 TFLOPS FP8 with sparsity figure on the RTX 2000 Ada applies only to sparse workloads and cannot be compared directly to dense figures from the Quadro RTX 4000.

The Quadro RTX 4000 suits workloads that require the published 57 TFLOPS dense FP16 rating and 416 GB/s memory bandwidth. Its 8 GB GDDR6 configuration combined with the higher bandwidth supports dense low precision operations where the RTX 2000 Ada lacks a comparable published dense FP16 value.

The RTX 2000 Ada suits workloads that require the 16 GB GDDR6 capacity and 12 TFLOPS FP32 rating along with the 70W TDP. Its 191.9 TFLOPS FP8 with sparsity rating further benefits sparse inference tasks that exceed the published capabilities of the Quadro RTX 4000.