Specifications Compared
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada | RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 220W |
| VRAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 2,816 | 5,888 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| FP16 (dense) | Not published | 40.6 TFLOPS |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| INT8 (dense) | Not published | 162.6 TOPS |
| Interconnect | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | 184 |
| FP32 Performance | 12 TFLOPS | 20.3 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| FP8 (with sparsity) | 191.9 TFLOPS | Not published |
| FP16 (with sparsity) | Not published | 81.3 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (with sparsity) | Not published | 325.2 TOPS |
Performance Analysis
FP32 throughput on the RTX 3070 exceeds that of the RTX 2000 Ada by a ratio of 20.3 to 12. This gap implies faster matrix operations during training steps that rely on dense FP32 calculations. Memory bandwidth on the RTX 3070 doubles the 224 GB/s figure of the RTX 2000 Ada and therefore supports larger batch sizes before memory stalls occur. The RTX 2000 Ada lists FP8 performance with sparsity at 191.9 TFLOPS while the RTX 3070 lists dense FP16 at 40.6 TFLOPS and FP16 with sparsity at 81.3 TFLOPS. Direct comparison of like figures remains limited to FP32 because the RTX 2000 Ada does not publish a dense FP16 value.
Current On-Demand Offers
Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.
RTX 2000 Ada
RTX 2000 Ada is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 2000 Ada rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.
RTX 3070
RTX 3070 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 3070 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.
Notify me when RTX 2000 Ada drops below a price
One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.
QuantaCloud
Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.
Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.
When to Choose the RTX 2000 Ada
The RTX 2000 Ada suits deployments that require 16 GB VRAM within a 70W power envelope. Workloads constrained by total system energy or slot power limits benefit from this configuration over the 220W TDP of the RTX 3070.
When to Choose the RTX 3070
The RTX 3070 fits tasks that need 20.3 TFLOPS FP32 and 448 GB/s bandwidth to maintain high utilization. Training or inference steps that scale with these metrics complete faster than on the RTX 2000 Ada.
Use Cases
The RTX 3070 supplies 20.3 TFLOPS FP32 and 448 GB/s bandwidth that accelerate gradient updates.
The RTX 2000 Ada provides 16 GB VRAM that accommodates larger models without swapping.
Higher FP32 throughput and bandwidth on the RTX 3070 shorten iteration times during adapter updates.
Both GPUs handle the workload yet the RTX 2000 Ada trades lower power for reduced bandwidth.
The RTX 3070 FP32 rating of 20.3 TFLOPS supports faster dense linear algebra kernels.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the FP32 ratings?▾
FP32 performance measures 12 TFLOPS on the RTX 2000 Ada and 20.3 TFLOPS on the RTX 3070.
Which GPU uses less power?▾
The RTX 2000 Ada TDP is 70W compared to the 220W TDP of the RTX 3070.
How does memory bandwidth compare?▾
Memory bandwidth reaches 224 GB/s on the RTX 2000 Ada and 448 GB/s on the RTX 3070.
Can FP16 figures be compared directly?▾
The RTX 2000 Ada does not publish an FP16 value so only FP32 figures allow direct comparison between the two GPUs.
What interconnect do both GPUs use?▾
Both the RTX 2000 Ada and the RTX 3070 use PCIe 4.0 interconnects.
Which is cheaper to rent, the RTX 2000 Ada or the RTX 3070?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the RTX 2000 Ada and RTX 3070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the RTX 2000 Ada have compared to the RTX 3070?▾
The RTX 2000 Ada has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find RTX 2000 Ada and RTX 3070 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the RTX 2000 Ada and the RTX 3070?▾
The RTX 2000 Ada uses the Ada Lovelace architecture (2024) while the RTX 3070 uses Ampere (2020). The RTX 2000 Ada has 16 GB of GDDR6 at 224 GB/s; the RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 at 448 GB/s, so the RTX 3070 has 2.0x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 2000 Ada.
Rent these GPUs
Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.
Related comparisons
How this page is made
- Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the RTX 2000 Ada and the RTX 3070. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
- Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
- The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
- Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.
Next steps
- Rent RTX 2000 ADAEvery current offer by provider, daily price history and a price alert.
- Rent RTX 3070Every current offer by provider, daily price history and a price alert.
- GPU price indexHow on-demand prices for the major GPUs have moved, updated daily.
- All GPUsEvery GPU we track, with current lows and provider counts.