GPU comparison

RTX 3070 vs RTX 4000 Ada

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

AmperevsAda LovelaceUpdated 33 days ago

The RTX 4000 Ada wins for the most common use case of model training and inference. Its 20 GB VRAM and 26.7 TFLOPS FP32 exceed the 8 GB and 20.3 TFLOPS on the RTX 3070 while operating at 130W TDP.

RTX 3070 listed from $0.13/GPU/hrRTX 4000 Ada listed from $0.28/GPU/hr

Right now, from live stock

  • Cheapest right now: RTX 4000 Ada at $0.28/hr on RunPod

    Deploy
  • Most providers in stock: RTX 4000 Ada (1)

    See all offers

Specifications Compared

SpecRTX 3070RTX 4000 Ada
TDP220W130W
VRAM8 GB20 GB
CUDA Cores5,8886,144
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
ArchitectureAmpereAda Lovelace
FP16 (dense)40.6 TFLOPSNot published
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
INT8 (dense)162.6 TOPSNot published
InterconnectPCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor Cores184192
FP32 Performance20.3 TFLOPS26.7 TFLOPS
Memory Bandwidth448 GB/s360 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)Not published427.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (with sparsity)81.3 TFLOPSNot published
INT8 (with sparsity)325.2 TOPSNot published

Performance Analysis

The RTX 3070 delivers FP16 dense performance of 40.6 TFLOPS and FP16 with sparsity of 81.3 TFLOPS alongside FP32 at 20.3 TFLOPS. The RTX 4000 Ada lists FP32 at 26.7 TFLOPS and FP8 with sparsity at 427.6 TFLOPS. Higher memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s on the RTX 3070 compared to 360 GB/s on the RTX 4000 Ada supports larger batch sizes in memory intensive operations. The 20 GB VRAM on the RTX 4000 Ada exceeds the 8 GB on the RTX 3070 and enables handling of larger models where memory capacity limits apply.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

RTX 3070

RTX 3070 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 3070 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX 4000 Ada

ProviderRegionGPUsPer GPU / hrInstance / hrDeploy
RunPodglobal1$0.28—Deploy

1 provider in stock, 1 offer. All RTX 4000 Ada offers, price history and alerts

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when RTX 3070 drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the RTX 3070

Scenarios with power availability up to 220W TDP and requirements for FP16 dense at 40.6 TFLOPS favor this option over alternatives with lower bandwidth.

When to Choose the RTX 4000 Ada

The RTX 4000 Ada fits scenarios needing 20 GB VRAM and 130W TDP for efficient operation. Workloads using FP32 at 26.7 TFLOPS or FP8 with sparsity at 427.6 TFLOPS align with this GPU in environments where lower power draw matters.

Use Cases

LLM Training
RTX 4000 Ada

The RTX 4000 Ada supplies 20 GB VRAM compared to 8 GB on the RTX 3070 for larger model sizes.

LLM Inference
RTX 4000 Ada

FP32 performance reaches 26.7 TFLOPS on the RTX 4000 Ada versus 20.3 TFLOPS on the RTX 3070.

Fine-tuning
RTX 4000 Ada

Lower TDP of 130W on the RTX 4000 Ada supports sustained runs with 20 GB memory capacity.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 3070

Memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s on the RTX 3070 exceeds 360 GB/s on the RTX 4000 Ada for image generation throughput.

Scientific Computing
Either

FP32 figures of 20.3 TFLOPS and 26.7 TFLOPS provide comparable base compute across both GPUs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the FP32 performance numbers?▾

The RTX 3070 reaches 20.3 TFLOPS in FP32 and the RTX 4000 Ada reaches 26.7 TFLOPS in FP32.

Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?▾

The RTX 3070 provides 448 GB/s bandwidth compared to 360 GB/s on the RTX 4000 Ada.

What TDP values apply to these GPUs?▾

The RTX 3070 lists 220W TDP and the RTX 4000 Ada lists 130W TDP.

Does the RTX 4000 Ada publish FP16 figures?▾

The RTX 4000 Ada does not publish FP16 figures while the RTX 3070 lists FP16 dense at 40.6 TFLOPS.

What architecture does each GPU use?▾

The RTX 3070 uses Ampere architecture and the RTX 4000 Ada uses Ada Lovelace architecture.

Which is cheaper to rent, the RTX 3070 or the RTX 4000 Ada?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the RTX 3070 and RTX 4000 Ada vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 have compared to the RTX 4000 Ada?▾

The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 4000 Ada has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find RTX 3070 and RTX 4000 Ada GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the RTX 3070 and the RTX 4000 Ada?▾

The RTX 3070 uses the Ampere architecture (2020) while the RTX 4000 Ada uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 at 448 GB/s; the RTX 4000 Ada has 20 GB of GDDR6 at 360 GB/s, so the RTX 3070 has 1.2x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4000 Ada.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the RTX 3070 and the RTX 4000 Ada. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps