GPU comparison

RTX 5000 Ada vs RTX A2000

Specifications and current cloud pricing, side by side.

Ada LovelacevsAmpereUpdated 33 days ago

The RTX 5000 Ada wins for the most common use case of LLM scale work because its 32 GB memory and 65.3 TFLOPS FP32 dense rating accommodate larger models and batches than the RTX A2000 can handle with its 6 to 12 GB and 8 TFLOPS figures.

RTX 5000 Ada listed from $0.55/GPU/hrRTX A2000 listed from $0.50/GPU/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecRTX 5000 AdaRTX A2000
TDP250W70W
VRAM32 GB6-12 GB
CUDA Cores12,8003,328
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAmpere
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
InterconnectPCIe 4.0PCIe 4.0
Tensor Cores400104
FP32 Performance65.3 TFLOPS8 TFLOPS
Memory Bandwidth576 GB/s288 GB/s
FP8 (with sparsity)1,044.4 TFLOPSNot published
FP16 (with sparsity)Not published63.9 TFLOPS

Performance Analysis

FP32 dense performance of 65.3 TFLOPS on the RTX 5000 Ada exceeds the 8 TFLOPS dense figure on the RTX A2000 by a ratio of eight to one. This gap translates to faster matrix operations during both training and inference steps when precision remains at FP32. Memory bandwidth of 576 GB/s on the RTX 5000 Ada doubles the 288 GB/s rate of the RTX A2000 and therefore supports larger batch sizes before memory capacity of 32 GB versus 6 to 12 GB becomes the limiting factor. FP16 with sparsity reaches 63.9 TFLOPS on the RTX A2000 while the RTX 5000 Ada lists FP8 with sparsity at 1044.4 TFLOPS so like for like sparse comparisons remain limited to available matching precisions.

Current On-Demand Offers

Cheapest secure on-demand offer per provider that is reported in stock right now, per GPU per hour; multi-GPU instances show the whole-instance price alongside. Deploy opens the DeployGPU console for providers on the platform, otherwise the provider's own site. Stock is rechecked every minute.

RTX 5000 Ada

RTX 5000 Ada is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX 5000 Ada rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

RTX A2000

RTX A2000 is not offered on-demand by any provider we track right now. See the RTX A2000 rental page for last-seen listed prices and a price alert.

Which GPU to watchWatch the price of

Notify me when RTX 5000 Ada drops below a price

One email when the cheapest in-stock on-demand price per GPU-hour falls below your threshold.

QuantaCloud

Comparing providers? We broker across all of them.

Stop tab-switching between pricing pages. Tell us what you need, 16+ GPUs reserved or cluster capacity, and we return one quote at partner rates within 24 hours.

No waitlist24hr quote turnaroundInfiniBand fabric

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the RTX 5000 Ada

The RTX 5000 Ada fits workloads that require the full 32 GB VRAM capacity and the 65.3 TFLOPS FP32 dense rating.

When to Choose the RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 fits power constrained environments that operate within the 70 W TDP limit and that stay inside the 6 to 12 GB memory range. Inference tasks or fine tuning jobs with modest model sizes gain efficiency from the lower power draw while still delivering 8 TFLOPS FP32 dense throughput.

Use Cases

LLM Training
RTX 5000 Ada

The 32 GB VRAM and 65.3 TFLOPS FP32 dense rating support larger models that exceed the 12 GB limit of the alternative.

LLM Inference
RTX 5000 Ada

Higher memory bandwidth of 576 GB/s sustains larger batch inference compared with 288 GB/s on the RTX A2000.

Fine-tuning
Either

Both cards handle fine tuning within their respective memory sizes of 32 GB versus 6 to 12 GB.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 5000 Ada

The 32 GB capacity accommodates higher resolution generation that the 6 to 12 GB card cannot match.

Scientific Computing
RTX 5000 Ada

FP32 dense throughput of 65.3 TFLOPS accelerates simulations beyond the 8 TFLOPS available on the RTX A2000.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the FP32 ratings for these cards?▾

FP32 dense performance measures 65.3 TFLOPS on the RTX 5000 Ada and 8 TFLOPS on the RTX A2000.

How does memory bandwidth compare?▾

Memory bandwidth reaches 576 GB/s on the RTX 5000 Ada and 288 GB/s on the RTX A2000.

Which GPU uses less power?▾

The RTX A2000 operates at a 70 W TDP while the RTX 5000 Ada operates at a 250 W TDP.

Do both GPUs support the same interconnect?▾

Both the RTX 5000 Ada and the RTX A2000 use PCIe 4.0 interconnects in PCIe form factors.

What sparse performance figures are published?▾

FP8 with sparsity reaches 1044.4 TFLOPS on the RTX 5000 Ada and FP16 with sparsity reaches 63.9 TFLOPS on the RTX A2000.

Which is cheaper to rent, the RTX 5000 Ada or the RTX A2000?▾

Cloud rental prices for both the RTX 5000 Ada and RTX A2000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Ada have compared to the RTX A2000?▾

The RTX 5000 Ada has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX A2000 has 6 to 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find RTX 5000 Ada and RTX A2000 GPUs available to rent right now?▾

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the RTX 5000 Ada and the RTX A2000?▾

The RTX 5000 Ada uses the Ada Lovelace architecture (2023) while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere (2021). The RTX 5000 Ada has 32 GB of GDDR6 at 576 GB/s; the RTX A2000 has 6-12 GB of GDDR6 at 288 GB/s, so the RTX 5000 Ada has 2.0x the memory bandwidth of the RTX A2000.

Rent these GPUs

Each GPU page lists every current on-demand offer by provider, per GPU-hour, updated every minute.

Related comparisons

How this page is made

  • Specifications come from the NVIDIA, AMD and Intel datasheets for the RTX 5000 Ada and the RTX A2000. Dense and sparse throughput are listed separately.
  • Prices and availability are live: every offer shown is an in-stock, on-demand listing from a provider we track, rechecked every minute.
  • The written comparison (overview, performance notes, when to choose each card, verdict, use cases and FAQ) was drafted with an AI model from the specification table above and passed an automated check that rejects any figure not in that table. It was last generated on . It contains no prices; those are always read live.
  • Read how we collect the data, or report an error on this page.

Next steps